Categorized: Ancient Landmarks Modern Freemasonry
Tagged:
Masonic landmarks are a set of principles that many Freemasons claim to be ancient and unchangeable precepts of Masonry. Issues of the “regularity” of a Freemasonic Lodge, Grand Lodge or Grand Orient are judged in the context of the landmarks. Because each Grand Lodge is self-governing, with no single body exercising authority over the whole of Freemasonry, the interpretations of these principles can and do vary, leading to controversies of recognition. Different Masonic jurisdictions have different landmarks.
The idea of an Ancient Landmark seems to refer to the Bible. In the Book of Proverbs, it states “Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set.” There are also precedents in Jewish law that state “Thou shall not remove thy neighbours’ landmark, which they of old time have set in your inheritance.” In either case, it refers to an area of land that may have stone markers used to define the property. Relating it to Freemasonry, the landmarks define the due bounds of a lodge, Grand Lodge or Grand Orient.
In 1723, in Anderson’s Constitutions it was stated that “Every Annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new Regulations or to alter these, for the real benefits of this Ancient Fraternity; provided always that the old Land-Marks be carefully preserved.” In the original book, it did not list the Landmarks.
In 1856, Albert Mackey defined what he thought were the 25 ancient landmarks. He also specified traits that any and all landmarks should possess.
- The fraternal modes of recognition
- The division of Masonry into 3 symbolic degrees
- The symbolic legend of Hiram Abiff
- The government of the fraternity by a Grand Master
- The prerogative of the Grand Master to preside over every assembly of the craft
- The prerogative of the Grand Master to issue dispensations for conferring degrees at irregular times
- The prerogative of the Grand Master to issue dispensations for opening and holding Lodges otherwise not established
- The prerogative of the Grand Master to make Masons at Sight
- The necessity for Masons to congregate in Lodges
- The government of Lodges to be by a Master and two Wardens
- The necessity that every Lodge when congregated be duly tiled
- The right of every Mason to be represented in all general meetings of the Craft
- The right of every Mason to appeal from his Lodge’s decisions to the Grand Lodge
- The right of every Mason to sit in every regular Lodge
- That no unknown visitor be allowed to sit in Lodge without being examined and found to be a Freemason
- That no Lodge can interfere in the business of another Lodge
- That every Freemason be amenable to the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which he resides
- That candidates for Freemasonry be required to meet certain qualifications; namely: being of mature age, not a cripple, and free-born.
- That a belief in the existence of God be a requirement for membership
- That belief in a resurrection to a future life be a requirement for membership
- That a “Book of the Law” shall constitute an indispensable part of the furniture of every Lodge
- The equality of Masons
- The secrecy of the Institution
- The foundation of a speculative science upon an operative art, and the symbolic use and explanation of the terms of that art for purposes of moral teaching
- That none of these landmarks can be changed.
In 1911, understanding Mackey’s 25 points to be a summary of Masonic “common law”, the legal scholar Roscoe Pound (1870-1964) distinguished seven of them as actual landmarks:
- Belief in a Supreme Being
- Belief in immortality
- That a “book of sacred law” is an indispensable part of the “furniture” (or furnishings) of the Lodge
- The legend of the Third Degree
- Secrecy (not specifying as to what)
- Symbolism of operative masonry
- That a Mason must be a man, freeborn, and of lawful age
Although Pound, did not include cripples (handicapped people) as unsuitable candidates for Freemasonry, he still refers to being born free as a prerequisite. So, according to Pound and our Rituals if one is born from enslaved parents he can not become a Mason. We should not forget that many of our founding fathers were slaveholders or had a financial interest in the slave industry. Some justify nowadays the word freeborn in our Ritual as being free from dogma and or preconceptions. That is however NOT what our ancient Brethren had in mind. We are all enslaved if only economically. Freemasonry however gives us the tools to set ourselves free from dogma and preconceptions. This is a freedom to acquire – not one you necessarily enter the Lodge with.
In a lecture, I found on freemasonrymatters.uk (author unknown) the following Landmarks were suggested for use by Modern Day Masonry:
- The modes of recognition
- The division of Symbolic Masonry into three degrees including the legend of the third degree.
- Masonry’s membership is composed exclusively of men of lawful age and of good report.
- The belief in a Supreme Being (the nature of Deity being left to the determination of the individual Brother)
- A belief in a persistence of personality (the nature of the persistence of personality being left to the determination of the individual Brother)
- A Volume of Sacred Law is an indispensable part of the lodge’s furniture (the Volume(s) of Sacred Law constituting the lodge’s furniture may reflect the faith of the individual Brethren)
- The equality of all Freemasons
- The secrecy of the institution
- The foundation of a speculative science on an operative art
Changes can be uncomfortable to many of us. This is not a problem with the Masonic Fraternity only, it is human nature to dislike change. It becomes uncomfortable to think that things are no longer going to “be the same.” Still, if it were not for innovative individuals within the history of Freemasonry, we might not be here to object to Innovations.
Thank you for this challenge. I won't get too excited about this as presently I am considering abandoning all contact with UGLE over the subject. Friendship, Integrity, Charity and Respect are the new UGLE Grand Principles! To my horror we seem to have someone pulling the chains and directing us towards the abyss of progress and not evolution.
The time of developing Grand Lodges was to ensure some stability and strength with all Lodges remaining private and free to be Freemasons as they saw it. This is changing in a subtle and steered course.
Evolution is not an option but progress is. Changing the ritual, it's catechism is only for the Freemason not a business personality. No learned Freemason would interfere with ritual in fear of losing the inherent truth and symbolic teaching.
The time has come for abandoning GL with all its Past Ranks of no value and seek a masonic College to governing truth and the ancient landmarks. More to follow: -
How can i join to mason?
Hi Frans,
Sorry for the late reply. Where do you live?
Revolution and not rebellion. Distinct and perhaps we should consider the newness of our lives compared to those of 600 years ago or even 100 years ago. Revolution is closer to evolution and stimulates challenge and radical thinking. Here is an idea!
GL's were formed in an age where most institutions were structured like pyramid's. Much has changed in management and class were now we have level playing fields and flat business structures. This fits well with our Craft, as equality and fraternity is truly our vision of the Craft. To consider the Master Mason as the highest masonic rank puts us all in perspective. All else is presently dressing up as Christmas Trees where it should be service. Service to the Master Masons Lodge.
To this end we should consider the establishment of Masonic Colleges of learning, research, and revision of the ancient landmarks and Grand Principles. What we have is special and we cannot allow watering down, suppression of statutes and guidance past down to us.
With a College we can move forward as a fraternity avoiding the inevitable destiny of abandoning the past for an uncertain future. I mean extinction.